BEcause all we are is objects to these people. THey aren’t capable of love or any other emotion. THey don’t even love himself, how could they ever love us like christ loved the church?THey can’t. ANd won’t. EVer. I swear my husband is possessed by demons, with all the evil he has done and abides to do. HOld your head high, you aren’t in control of his manner. YOu are allowed to leave and be happier. HE is taking you farther away from god, and jesus knows that and forgives us for divorcing these brutes!PErsonally, i would rather be forgiven for a divorce, where in my singledom i can get back to god, than trapped with someone who will make sure i never grow spiritually. GOod luck hun and god bless. HE sees you and knows your agony. COgnitive behavioural therapy cbt or inquisitive emotive therapy self help books availablewill assist you to verbalise your dilemas and grief over the disablement to be part of your grandchildren’s lives without the touching abuse from narc. YOu can change your since and emotions aroound this, make your own resolutions based on what skills you can develope to deflect hurtful projections and manage to have some relationship with your grandies…. ALl power to you. REmember what they say and do mimics what is about them and not you. YOu might like to imagine a mirror between her and you so what hurtful management etc is given out bounces back at the narc, and is not combined into your loving self. YOga can also help that self energizing, focus on the inner nurturer, only responsible for one self and consenting that change comes from within and what is around us just is and not our liability. HOpe this helps. FRom reading this n what everybody is saying im guessing my ex/boyfriend any he is in my life is at narcissist. HE has been in my life for 3yrs kno. ANd for the 1st yr aggregate was ok we had our ups n downs but we worked them thru. HE lost his father n then his friend n then things changed. CHeating, lien, i feel used. I try to leave n get out but i feel lost with out him i don’t kno what to do. I have changed my number 2 times n he txt or calls or email n i fall into it. I changed my n its like a drug to have to talk to him. I dont kno why i even think he can change, it kills me inside. HE don’t see the pain he is causing me. I need help to get out of it n not fall back but i dont know how :im questioning if i had the hoover manuover done on me!I’m sure my ex is a narcissist!I dumped him after another tantrum in which complicated me called be police and subsequently him blaming me!FOr months he sent love songs, texts even flowers, never had flowers even after our kids were born, no note though with them!OFfered me coffee, takeaways etc etc, then hastily he’s got a girl friend and she’s moved in with him!WOw not even introduced her to the kids!THen the random stuff begins, once maybe twice a month a email of nothing but a jar of sweets or anything else!THen social media, the endless pics of them posing looking so happy!THen the texts telling me he met a famous guy at the weekend!?YEs and ?YOu’ve got a girl friend so why text me?IT’s been 5 mths since then as i ignored everything he sent me and he’s gone definitely silent!I was inquisitive if he was trying to cook me or perhaps triangulate?I married him. WAs tired of the roller coaster and wanted it to stop. I thought if i brought dependability to his life – structure, etc.
FOr box, when the check was declined because it would have caused the patron’s credit limit to be exceeded, the purchaser still owed the debt that the check was at first written to cover. IN affixing, the client may be liable for fees resulting from the check not being honored. FOr example, the payee may pass on the cost of the bounced check to the shopper and, dangling on what the check was for, may assess a late fee against the consumer if the check was used to pay a bill that then became past due. ONce the check is written, if there is a decline in the credit line such that the bank will not cover the check, the harm to the bank’s client is unavoidable. ALthough the consultants found this custom to be injurious to public i. E. , whether an injury is outweighed by countervailing benefits turns on the facts of each case; though the counsellors in credit card lending advice 3 found the injury outweighed by the gains, a different finding may result from extra facts. 22credit card lending lesson 3:banks should closely examine, monitor, and test their affairs labors to confirm the gains attached with those applies be they related to a product or service, in their net effect, outweigh any harm resulting from such practices. FOr instance, while certain payment allowance exercises in segregation may appear onerous and unfair, such practices, in their net effect, may benefit buyers and competitions e. G. , the approachability of low rate balance carries or other exaltation rates. IN addition, exercises that do not result in a fair traffic of value between banks and their buyers are likely contrary to best—and sustainable—events exercises, as evidenced by current macroeconomic and commercial events. 23public policy—as established by statute, principle, or juridical determinations—may be deliberate in determining whether an act or practice is unfair under section 5 of the ftc act. FOr example, a credit card lending custom that violates a federal banking principle may evidence an unfair act or custom. IN credit card lending consultancy 4, a bank failed to provide requisite finance charge disclosures under canon z truth in lending yet charged finance charges to a grazer’s account. THe consultants cited the violation of rule z as data of an unfair credit card lending meeting. CRedit card lending lesson 4:the outcomes of noncompliance with web browser shield laws and book are not limited to the legal and regulatory corrections meticulous to those laws. IN credit card lending advice 4, a bank’s malfeasance of regulation z was found to evidence conduct contrary to public policy and, thus, was premeditated in analyzing unfairness under section 5 of the ftc act. THerefore, a broad and useful acquiescence administration program—one that avoids an overly myopic and, thus, limited admittance to submission—will greatly benefit a bank ordinarily, and in all with respect to conformity with section 5 of the ftc act. 4 to ensure the highest degree of consistency and uniformity while the supervisory and constraint exercises of the agency, the fdic keeps a consultive process applicable to several compliance inquiry matters, including section 5 of the ftc act. DEpending on the issue, a “consultancies” may be all from a simple phone chat or a series of e mails to formal memoranda among field, regional, and American capital fdic staff members. THese notices are useful in accepting the quality and conformity of conformity, fair lending, and protectorate reinvestment act inquiry and oversight. COnsultations ensure that senior divide of supervision and betrayer armor executives are alerted to significant or unusual supervisory issues and that those issues receive adapted and timely concern. THe examination advisory process also helps the fdic develop more answerer and telling deference procedures and controls. EXaminers see “bough of superintendence and betrayer helmet message system, class. NO. 6456” may 7, 2004. 20 however, substantial injury may involve other forms of harm. FOr case, unwarranted health and safety risks may also support a finding of unfairness. FOr an example, see philip morris, inc. , 82 f.